{
  "id": 1094,
  "rank": 2943,
  "name": "Historical Maximum Breakout",
  "aka": [
    "Historical Maximum Breakout Strategy",
    "Pivot High Breakout"
  ],
  "family": "K",
  "subtype": "K4",
  "one_liner": "Buy at pivot highs breakouts and sell at relative minimums between the breakout of a pivot high and that pivot high.",
  "market_regime": "trending|volatile",
  "timeframes": [
    "Daily",
    "Weekly",
    "Monthly"
  ],
  "symbols": [
    "Stocks/ETFs"
  ],
  "sessions": [
    "null"
  ],
  "indicators": [],
  "entry_long": [
    "high > currentMax",
    "low < low[1] and currentMax > historicalMax",
    "buyPrice = historicalMax"
  ],
  "entry_short": [
    "null"
  ],
  "exit_rules": [
    "exitPrice = currentMin * (1 - exitFilter/100)",
    "high < high[1] and currentMax > historicalMax",
    "exitPrice = max(breakevenStop, exitPrice)",
    "sell at exitPrice stop"
  ],
  "filters": [
    "null"
  ],
  "stop_loss": "null",
  "take_profit": "null",
  "position_size": "positionSize = ROUND((equity * risk/100) / (buyPrice - exitPrice))",
  "evidence_type": "source_code",
  "completeness": 80.0,
  "signal_warnings": null,
  "claim_warnings": null,
  "opacity_warnings": null,
  "build_warnings": [
    "DAILY_LOW_COUNT: daily-or-slower timeframe on a single instrument. Expect well under 100 trades in five years, so a backtest will rarely reach statistical significance on its own."
  ],
  "canonical": "https://prismaticalgos.com/compendium/algo/1094-historical-maximum-breakout",
  "snapshot": "2026-10-31 15:46 UTC",
  "source_url": "https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/aclaraciones-sobre-una-estrategia-propuesta-por-quo-en-el-forum-en-ingles/",
  "limitations": "These are machine-extracted research records, not verified trading systems. Catalog rank measures specification detail and claimed evidence, not profitability. The catalog extraction pipeline did not independently backtest these records. Its separate selected testing ledger does not validate the wider corpus. Rules, labels and parameters can be incomplete or wrong; consult the original source and its reuse terms."
}