Prismatic portfolios · Our flagship · Portfolio v3

Prismatic Spectrum.

The portfolio developed as v3, now named. Six algorithms across 20 currency, gold and index markets, combined into one. A hypothetical backtest of a $50,000 account, January 2020 – July 2026, measured against the S&P 500 and through every market decline in between.

The headline

The same $50,000, a different path.

49.4%
Compound annual return
S&P 500 15.3%
−9.9%
Deepest decline
S&P 500 −33.7%
2.99
Sharpe ratio
S&P 500 0.67
Line chart: $50,000 invested at the end of 2019 grows to $701,737 in the Prismatic Spectrum hypothetical backtest versus $127,314 in the S&P 500 ETF by July 2026.
Growth of $50,000, December 31, 2019 – July 31, 2026. Shaded bands mark the seven S&P 500 declines examined below. Hypothetical backtest.
Prismatic Spectrum against the three major US indexes, same period, same $50,000 start.
 Prismatic SpectrumS&P 500Dow JonesNasdaq-100
Ending value$701,737$127,314$103,435$168,072
Compound annual return49.4%15.3%11.7%20.2%
Deepest decline−9.9%−33.7%−36.7%−35.1%
Sharpe ratio2.990.670.520.75
Longest stretch below a high93 days709 days694 days716 days
Months with a gain91.1%64.6%64.6%62%

Hypothetical backtested results — not actual trading. Prismatic Spectrum trades fixed position sizes on a $50,000 account, so profits are not reinvested. Indexes are ETF total returns with dividends reinvested. Simulated results have inherent limitations and do not guarantee future results.

Inside the portfolio

Six algorithms.
Twenty sleeves.

A sleeve is one algorithm trading one market. Spectrum runs 20 of them side by side. They are deliberately unalike: what hurts one is often what pays another.

6
Algorithms
20 market sleeves
−$45,680
Their worst declines, added up
Five largest algorithms, measured separately
−$9,794
The portfolio’s worst decline
What they produced together
Cumulative profit of the portfolio's five largest algorithms as separate lines, above the combined portfolio line (hypothetical backtest).
Top: the five largest algorithms, each shown separately. Bottom: the same algorithms combined into one portfolio. Hypothetical backtest.

That is the whole argument for a portfolio in one picture. Run separately, the five largest algorithms suffered worst declines adding to −$45,680. Run together, the portfolio’s worst decline was −$9,794 — because they did not have their bad days at the same time.

Each algorithm measured on its own, in the same $50,000 account, at the position sizes it is given inside the portfolio. Hypothetical backtest, 2019-12-31 – 2026-07-31.
AlgorithmMarketsCAGRDeepest declineProfit factorSharpeShare of profit
CobaltEUR/USD, AUD/USD, NZD/USD, EUR/GBP, AUD/NZD33.2%−3.2%3.387.7642.8%
VermilionGBP/USD, USD/JPY, USD/CHF, NZD/USD, EUR/JPY, CAD/JPY, EUR/USD, US 500, Germany 40, Japan 225, US 3028.0%−39.2%1.151.0931.2%
TealXAU/USD17.0%−7.4%1.631.3713.9%
AmberXAU/USD12.8%−8.2%1.841.689.3%
MagentaUSD/JPY4.8%−15.6%1.360.242.8%
VioletAUD basket0.1%−4.3%1.04-2.330.0%
All together — Prismatic Spectrum20 sleeves across currencies, gold and indices49.4%−9.9%1.372.99100%

What that table also shows

  • One algorithm supplies 43% of the profit. Cobalt, which runs five currency pairs, earned $279,231 of the portfolio’s $651,737. Spectrum is diversified in its markets, less so in its sources of return.
  • The second-largest algorithm is the riskiest one on its own. Run by itself Vermilion fell −39.2% — deeper than the S&P 500’s −33.7%, and it wins only 39.2% of its trades. It earns its place by winning bigger than it loses (1.15 profit factor) in markets the others do not touch, sized so that decline is survivable.
  • Under a harsher assumption the numbers come down. If the largest algorithm is modelled at the execution quality its vendor reports on a live account rather than in the tester, the portfolio returns 40.6% a year with a −16.8% deepest decline and a Sharpe of 1.96 — instead of 49.4%, −9.9% and 2.99. We publish both.
  • 2026 has been the weak year. Through July, Spectrum is up 3.8% against the S&P 500’s 10.1%. It trailed all three indexes.

Hypothetical backtested results — not actual trading. Prismatic Spectrum trades fixed position sizes on a $50,000 account, so profits are not reinvested. Indexes are ETF total returns with dividends reinvested. Simulated results have inherent limitations and do not guarantee future results.

Turbulence

How Spectrum performed during market crashes.

Since 2020 the S&P 500 has had seven declines we consider worth measuring — six of 7% or more, plus the three-day shock around the Silicon Valley Bank failure. Each chart below puts $50,000 into both Spectrum and the S&P 500 on the day the index peaked, and follows them to its trough.

Profit factor is what every dollar the portfolio lost bought in winnings: above 1.00 it made money, below 1.00 it lost. It is the honest companion to a win rate — in the 2020 tech sell-off Spectrum won 66.4% of its trades, better than its 63.7% average, and still lost money, because the losers were bigger. Its profit factor that month, 0.91, says so plainly.

6 of 7
Declines Spectrum gained through
Its one loss was smaller than every index’s fall
25/28
Months up while the S&P 500 fell
Across 79 months
1.37
Profit factor across the whole backtest
15,736 trades · 63.7% winners · correlation with the S&P 500 -0.04

Covid crash

2020-02-19 → 2020-03-23 · 23 trading days

+31.8%
Return
$15,875 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −33.7%
−$3,117
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$16,850
1.54
Profit factor
217 trades · 55.3% winners
Covid crash, 2020-02-19 to 2020-03-23: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

Markets repriced a pandemic in five weeks. Spectrum’s gold and currency positions gained while shares fell.

2020 tech sell-off

2020-09-02 → 2020-09-23 · 14 trading days

−3.2%
Return
−$1,581 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −9.4%
−$4,073
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$4,700
0.91
Profit factor
128 trades · 66.4% winners
2020 tech sell-off, 2020-09-02 to 2020-09-23: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

The one decline Spectrum lost money in. Its loss was still smaller than every index’s fall.

2022 inflation bear market

2022-01-03 → 2022-10-12 · 195 trading days

+246.5%
Return
$123,262 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −24.5%
−$6,883
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$12,250
1.46
Profit factor
2,223 trades · 63.6% winners
2022 inflation bear market, 2022-01-03 to 2022-10-12: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

Nine months of rising rates. The longest window we measured, and Spectrum’s largest dollar gain.

SVB banking crisis

2023-03-08 → 2023-03-13 · 3 trading days

+6.3%
Return
$3,131 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −3.4%
−$336
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$1,700
1.92
Profit factor
38 trades · 71.1% winners
SVB banking crisis, 2023-03-08 to 2023-03-13: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

Three days around a bank failure — short, sharp, and barely visible in the portfolio.

Yen carry-trade unwind

2024-07-16 → 2024-08-05 · 14 trading days

+16.3%
Return
$8,143 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −8.4%
−$2,984
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$4,200
1.56
Profit factor
124 trades · 59.7% winners
Yen carry-trade unwind, 2024-07-16 to 2024-08-05: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

The yen carry trade unwound in three weeks. A currency shock is the kind of move these algorithms trade.

Tariff tantrum

2025-02-19 → 2025-04-08 · 34 trading days

+14.9%
Return
$7,452 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −18.8%
−$5,205
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$9,400
1.17
Profit factor
416 trades · 63.2% winners
Tariff tantrum, 2025-02-19 to 2025-04-08: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

A seven-week slide on trade policy. Spectrum gained while the S&P 500 lost nearly a fifth.

Early-2026 sell-off

2026-01-27 → 2026-03-30 · 43 trading days

+22.4%
Return
$11,210 on $50,000 · S&P 500 −8.9%
−$6,347
Deepest dip in the window
S&P 500 fell −$4,450
1.22
Profit factor
469 trades · 66.3% winners
Early-2026 sell-off, 2026-01-27 to 2026-03-30: $50,000 in Prismatic Spectrum (hypothetical) versus $50,000 in the S&P 500 ETF.

The most recent decline, and the closest to today’s market conditions.

All seven declines, against all three indexes. $50,000 placed at the S&P 500’s peak. Hypothetical backtest.
DeclineWindowPrismatic SpectrumS&P 500DowNasdaq-100
Covid crash2020-02-19 → 2020-03-23+31.8%−33.7%−36.3%−27.9%
2020 tech sell-off2020-09-02 → 2020-09-23−3.2%−9.4%−7.9%−12.7%
2022 inflation bear market2022-01-03 → 2022-10-12+246.5%−24.5%−18.9%−34.3%
SVB banking crisis2023-03-08 → 2023-03-13+6.3%−3.4%−2.9%−2.4%
Yen carry-trade unwind2024-07-16 → 2024-08-05+16.3%−8.4%−5.5%−12.3%
Tariff tantrum2025-02-19 → 2025-04-08+14.9%−18.8%−15.4%−22.8%
Early-2026 sell-off2026-01-27 → 2026-03-30+22.4%−8.9%−7.4%−11.4%

Spectrum’s figures are profit and loss as a percentage of the $50,000 account, because it trades fixed position sizes rather than reinvesting. The index figures are the return on $50,000 invested at the peak. Over the 2022 window that difference is large: Spectrum’s $123,262 of profit is +246.5% of the starting account, earned over 195 trading days.

Hypothetical backtested results — not actual trading. Prismatic Spectrum trades fixed position sizes on a $50,000 account, so profits are not reinvested. Indexes are ETF total returns with dividends reinvested. Simulated results have inherent limitations and do not guarantee future results.

The risk side

What a bad stretch looked like.

Returns are the part everyone reads. The chart below is the part that decides whether you are still holding the portfolio when the returns arrive.

−9.9%
Deepest decline
S&P 500 −33.7%
93 days
Longest stretch below a high
S&P 500 709 days
−$11,533
Worst decline, trade by trade
23% of the $50,000 account
Percentage below previous high: Prismatic Spectrum's deepest decline −9.9% versus −33.7% for the S&P 500 (hypothetical backtest).
Decline from previous high, December 31, 2019 – July 31, 2026. Hypothetical backtest.

Measured on daily closes the deepest decline was −9.9%. Measured trade by trade — the way an account actually experiences it, including positions closing within a day — the worst run was −$11,533, or 23% of the starting account. Both are real; the second is the one to plan around.

Hypothetical backtested results — not actual trading. Prismatic Spectrum trades fixed position sizes on a $50,000 account, so profits are not reinvested. Indexes are ETF total returns with dividends reinvested. Simulated results have inherent limitations and do not guarantee future results.

Disclosures

What these numbers are, and are not.

Prismatic Spectrum has never been traded with real money. Everything on this page is a simulation run in the MetaTrader 5 Strategy Tester on historical tick data. It is published so you can examine the construction method and judge the evidence — not as a record of results any account achieved.

Important information about these results

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

What is shown. Prismatic Spectrum results are a hypothetical backtest of six algorithms running 20 market sleeves in the MetaTrader 5 Strategy Tester on historical tick data from December 31, 2019 to July 31, 2026, combined at fixed position sizes chosen for a $50,000 account. Profits are not reinvested. Results are closed-trade (realized) profit and loss after modelled commissions, gold slippage and an execution haircut on one algorithm; they exclude swings in open positions, financing differences between brokers, and any management or performance fees. Several algorithms’ settings were chosen or tuned using data from within this period, so the results are partly in-sample. Three sleeves have no data before 2021–2022 and one algorithm begins in 2024; each contributes nothing before its data begins. The portfolio as a whole has not been traded with real money.

Indexes. S&P 500, Dow Jones and Nasdaq-100 are represented by the SPY, DIA and QQQ exchange-traded funds with dividends reinvested (adjusted closes, Yahoo Finance), which include each fund’s expense ratio. Sharpe ratios use the 3-month U.S. Treasury bill rate (FRED DTB3). Market-decline dates are the S&P 500 ETF’s closing peak and trough.

Risk. Trading foreign exchange, gold and index CFDs on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage can work against you as well as for you, and losses can exceed deposits. Past performance, whether actual or simulated, is not indicative of future results. This material is for information only and is not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security, fund interest or advisory service.

Let’s talk

What would you like to explore next?

Questions about our research, portfolios or your next step? Get in touch.

Contact Us